No matter what goes on in the organization, a task that is owned is a task that will have more chances of completion, with pride and focus on outstanding performance. As such, the task tends to be delivered on time, within scope and budget.
Micromanagement does not have to exist when ownership is present and the team agrees to the game plan. Instead, there is clear and visible status reporting with team members eager to present their progress -- good or bad. This transparency allows the team to focus on the right solution and approach, with a clearer view of the roadblocks and their resolution.
Defenses tend to come down as we focus on delivery: doing what we are expected to do and doing what we know we can and should do to deliver quality results. When ownership is truly present, team members exchange workable ideas in a productive discourse. We're open to see our own blind spots, areas that we naturally overlook or don't think to question.
And when the realization of the specific blind spot is a reality, it creates a clearing for something new.


Couldn't agree more on this. And it's an art to empower people to let them understand their ownership in their task :)
Your first statement says it all really, and I agree wholeheartedly. Thank you for providing the opposite condition of 'ownership' as being 'micromanagement.' That's an excellent way to define ownership; for some people the idea is new. I receive great benefits by having project team members take ownership and move forward with their deliverables. It really does add to the meaning of team and getting more than the sum of the individual parts.