It is late, nearly midnight, and I just returned from the The Economist magazine's Innovation Award Ceremony, here in
What was so amazing about Jimmy Wales (other than the fact that he was born, raised and educated in
In fact, one of the most fantastic innovations ever was the micro-loan. Economist Muhammad Yunus came up with the idea of micro-credit in 1974, after giving a woman in the
John Kao, the noted author and lecturer on innovation (Jamming: the Art and Discipline of Business Creativity; and Innovation Nation) spoke about this at the recent Forbes Magazine Leadership Network meeting in
More importantly, he stressed that the next version of innovation ("game changing" innovation) needed to tackle what he called the list of "wicked problems," such as AIDS, climate change, energy independence, etc. To do so, he said we needed a really high-level strategic road map, one which only nations could develop, and in some cases, only leagues of nations. In other words, nations need to develop strategies that embraced innovation, specifically targeted at "wicked problems." The reason, John explained, was to ensure that we could take the "big bets" and the "very high risk" solutions to solve the problems. He said -- and I agree -- that the world has the creative talent and technology now to attack the wicked list of problems
Tonight, there were many examples of great innovation leaders that received awards. However, something different struck me during the program that related back to what John Kao said. More specifically, an individual and a company received awards that had several things in common. The individual was Matti Makkonen, creator of Short Message Service (SMS) protocol, while the company that received the award for a sustainable innovation culture was Nokia. The first thing that they had in common was that they both represent the telecommunications industry. In fact, Matti, after spending much of his career with Sonera (Formerly P&T, the telecom and postal authority of
However, there is another important factor that they have in common: their home country of
Yes, we need innovation as a strategy, especially to tackle our problems. And we need Project Management to make sure that we deliver on this strategy. No one at the ceremony avoided the importance on execution of strategy and delivering the innovation. And yet, I am both excited and worried at the same time. Will this financial crisis be the great global distraction that I mentioned before? There are already signs that projects are being pulled back and budgets cut. I hate to think that we will take our eye off the prize, focus on cost rather than value, and stop thinking about innovation...taking the low risk path. Do we have that much time to wait to solve the "wicked list" of global problems?
More tomorrow.
Greg, thanks for this post. I completely agree that project management is the engine which drives innovation.
I wrote today about a topic I brought up when we met in Denver last month. It wasn't well-articulated then, and hopefully I have done a better job of it now. I think the body of knowledge is ready for a new area: Opportunity Management.
My post points out some of the pragmatic barriers in place when it comes to project managers capturing, let alone looking for, opportunities. The approach I suggest has the potential to address this issue. It's already being done in many organizations by project managers...but not as a recognized component of project management. Let's make it part of the standard.
Josh Nankivel
pmStudent.com